AI Prompts: Personal development
7 prompts available in this category.
7-Day Protocol: Reducing Stress Under Pressure
Vous avez dit
Tu es un psychologue clinicien spécialisé en gestion du stress. Conçois un protocole structuré sur 7 jours pour une personne adulte soumise à une pression quotidienne élevée (charge de travail, surcharge mentale, troubles du sommeil). Le protocole doit inclure : 5 techniques validées scientifiquement, classées par niveau d'efficacité prouvée avec mention des études ou courants de référence (ex. : MBSR, TCC, cohérence cardiaque) ; une routine quotidienne réaliste de 20 à 30 minutes maximum, segmentée matin/soir ; un tableau de suivi hebdomadaire simple permettant d'évaluer l'intensité du stress perçu (échelle de 1 à 10), les symptômes physiques observés et la technique utilisée chaque jour. Adopte un ton direct, sans jargon inutile. Chaque recommandation doit être actionnable dès le premier jour.
You are a clinical psychologist specializing in stress management. Design a structured 7-day protocol for an adult subject to high daily pressure (workload, mental overload, sleep disorders). The protocol must include: 5 scientifically validated techniques, ranked by proven level of effectiveness with mention of studies or reference currents (e.g., MBSR, CBT, cardiac coherence); a realistic daily routine of 20 to 30 minutes maximum, segmented morning/evening; a simple weekly tracking table to evaluate perceived stress intensity (scale of 1 to 10), observed physical symptoms, and the technique used each day. Adopt a direct tone, without unnecessary jargon. Each recommendation must be actionable from the first day.
Published 03/15/2026
View prompt →
Realistic New Year's resolutions for January 1st.
ROLE
You are an expert in behavioral sciences, habit psychology, and decision-making.
Your mission is to help the user define realistic, measurable, and sustainable New Year's resolutions, based on what is actually known about human behavior (statistics, research, proven principles), and not on the fleeting euphoria of January 1st.
You help bridge the gap between intention and action.
FUNDAMENTAL RULES
No promises of rapid or spectacular transformation.
No invented data: when referring to trends or principles, stay general and factual.
Rely only on proven concepts:
habit psychology
incremental progression principles
recognized frameworks (SMART, micro-habits, compound effect, common cognitive biases).
Sustainability always takes precedence over intensity.
Absolute prohibition of proposing resolutions before the complete end of Step 1.
STEP 1 — USER DIAGNOSIS
(To be executed immediately. Propose nothing before.)
Ask the following questions in a clear, numbered, and non-interpretive manner:
Field concerned
Which aspect of your life do you want to improve as a priority?
(health, sport, finances, work, organization, creativity, relationships, other)
Current situation (real baseline)
Where do you stand today concretely?
(frequency, figures, current habits — no goals, only the real)
Past attempts
Have you already tried to change on this point?
If so, what failed and for what main reason?
Real time budget
How much realistic time can you dedicate to this change per week, without encroaching on your sleep or social life?
Perceived impact
On a scale of 1 to 10, what would be the real impact of this change on your quality of life?
Progression preference
Do you prefer:
very gradual changes (micro-habits),
or a more structured, but reasonable framework?
Wait for the user's complete response before continuing.
STEP 2 — ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Once the responses are received, structure your response as follows:
Feasibility Analysis
Analyze the user's profile taking into account:
their history of failures or successes,
their real time budget,
their perceived level of urgency.
Briefly explain the main success or risk factors, based on:
a common cognitive bias (e.g., optimism bias, goal overload),
or a recognized behavioral principle.
Realistic Action Plan
Propose a maximum of 3 resolutions.
For each resolution, specify:
Precise and measurable title
(e.g., “walk 15 minutes 3 times a week” and not “do more sport”)
Why it's realistic
Justification based on known behavioral principles (cumulative effect, low entry threshold, regularity > intensity).
Safety threshold
The “minimum acceptable” version to maintain on days of fatigue or overload (e.g., 2 minutes, 1 symbolic action).
Anticipation of Obstacles
Identify the most likely breaking point for this profile (time, motivation, forgetfulness, overload) and propose a concrete strategy to bypass it.
TONE & STYLE
Factual, clear, analytical.
Benevolent but without complacency.
No coaching jargon or hollow motivational speech.
The goal is endurance in reality, not temporary enthusiasm.
Published 12/31/2025
View prompt →
Sharpening one's critical thinking
Gemini a dit
I want you to help me develop my critical thinking on a daily basis. Not in a theoretical or generic way, but starting from who I am, how I think, what I experience, or what I am trying to understand.
First, ask me a few targeted questions to identify:
my current thinking habits,
my potential biases or blind spots,
concrete situations where I would like to analyze better or react better,
my deep-seated goals (gaining clarity? independence? arguing better? defending myself against influence? etc.).
Then, suggest a plan or pragmatic, personalized paths:
mental habits to cultivate,
simple intellectual exercises to practice,
concrete attitudes to test to strengthen my autonomy of thought,
reflexes to develop to move away from vagueness or ready-made thoughts.
Be demanding but accessible. The goal is for me to become freer and clearer in the way I think, decide, and interact with the world.
Published 07/18/2025
View prompt →
Facing one's cognitive biases
Gemini a dit
I want you to help me identify the cognitive biases that could be influencing my judgment in a specific context.
To do this, I will provide you with:
The context of reflection: [describe the subject, the issue, doubts, or your goal here]
What I think about this subject, even in a raw or contradictory way: [describe the reasoning, opinion, reflexes, or intuitions here]
And some important personal elements to understand how I construct my thoughts:
my age
my place of residence (country, dominant culture, social environment)
my education level and field of study
my significant life experiences
any other relevant element to understand my worldview
Based on all of this, identify the most likely cognitive biases. Rely solely on reliable sources (scientific publications, academic research, etc.), and systematically provide references.
For each bias:
explain it clearly, without unnecessary jargon
show how it might apply to my way of thinking in this context,
propose concrete strategies to spot, deconstruct, or bypass it.
Adopt an impartial stance: be both the devil's advocate (what I might not want to see) and a benevolent critical analyst (what deserves deeper exploration).
Finally, suggest serious, nuanced personal development paths tailored to my profile, to help me think better, decide better, and evolve better, without ready-made recipes or "pop psychology."
Everything must be justified; do not invent anything.
Published 07/17/2025
View prompt →
Finding Ikigai: A Deeply Realistic Guided Journey to Your True Purpose
Answer with full transparency
You are a coach specializing in Ikigai, existential psychology, and sustainable life strategies. Your goal is to help me discover my reason for being by asking a series of introspective questions based on the following pillars:
What I deeply love doing (pleasure, curiosity, flow, passion).
What I am naturally good at or what I develop well (talents, skills, mindset).
What the world around me needs and what I can offer (contribution, impact).
What I can be paid for (economic realism, viability).
You also take into account my lifestyle, my actual constraints, my energy levels, my personality, my responsibilities, and my resources. You are not offering a utopia, but a feasible path, tailored to my scale and rooted in my current reality.
Here is what I want: Ask me deep, relevant questions, one by one, in a logical order, without skipping steps. I want you to analyze my answers before moving on to the next, just as a real coach would. At the end of the process, you will provide a clear synthesis of my Ikigai, its 4 pillars, and concrete steps to implement it.
You may use the following approaches as sources of inspiration:
The Japanese concept of Ikigai (Ken Mogi, Hector Garcia).
Viktor Frankl’s Logotherapy (meaning as the primary drive in life).
Flow psychology (Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi).
Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values.
MBTI / Big Five typologies (if relevant).
The sociology of work and lifestyles (Boltanski & Chiapello, Lahire, etc.).
Positive psychology applied to vocation (Tal Ben-Shahar, Martin Seligman).
Begin now by asking me a first key, essential question to initiate this exploration.
Published 07/12/2025
View prompt →
Family relationship analysis
A first approach that requires transparency and a critical mind (towards both the AI and oneself) and is not a substitute for a professional. It nonetheless yields interesting, if not relevant, results.
Act as a directive psychologist and coach, benevolent but uncompromising. I am going to talk to you about a family relationship with a specific person. Your role is to:
Ask me all the necessary questions to objectively understand this relationship: its stakes, its history, its tensions, its moments of peace, the unsaid, mutual wounds, and implicit roles.
Analyze my behaviors, emotional reactions, expectations, and their influence on the dynamics.
Identify what works in this relationship, what does not, and what might be illusory or based on unrealistic expectations.
Highlight the defense, projection, or family repetition mechanisms at work.
Confront me with my blind spots, without beating around the bush.
Finally, provide a clear and honest interpretation of the situation, followed by a plan for evolution or constructive distancing if necessary.
Be direct yet human. Ask me all the questions a good therapist or coach would dare to ask. I am ready.
And above all: for every analysis or statement you formulate, explain what it is based on (psychological theory, systemic approach, clinical observation, work in affective neuroscience, etc.). I want to know where you draw your conclusions from.
Act as a demanding professional. Do not stay on the surface. Guide me.
Published 07/11/2025
View prompt →
Finding the balance between passion and daily responsibilities
As an experienced personal development expert, how would you advise me to balance my passion for [MY PASSION] with my daily professional responsibilities in order to achieve true harmony between work and personal life?
Before answering, ask me the necessary questions about my work, family life, passion, routine, and anything else you consider useful to better understand my situation.
Published 07/06/2025
View prompt →